GAVIN v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
| LEONARD GAVIN |
| ABC COMPANY 1-3 (said name being fictitious and unknown), ABM AVIATION, INC., DEF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (same name being fictitious and unknown), UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 (Said names being fictitious and unknown) and ABC CORPORATION 1-10 |
| 2:2019cv08924 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ABM AVIATION, INC. identifying ABM INDUSTRIES, INC. as Corporate Parent.. (KALLHOVD, ERIK) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED AIRLINES, INC. identifying United Continental Holding, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (KALLHOVD, ERIK) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by ABM AVIATION, INC.. (KALLHOVD, ERIK) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by UNITED AIRLINES, INC.. (KALLHOVD, ERIK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ABM AVIATION, INC., UNITED AIRLINES, INC. from Superior Court of Essex County, NJ, case number ESX L 000963-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9527148), filed by ABM AVIATION, INC., UNITED AIRLINES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KALLHOVD, ERIK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
