UZOUKWU ODUTOLA v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
| FIDELIA N. UZOUKWU ODUTOLA |
| CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2019cv11754 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| James B Clark |
| Labor: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CITY OF NEWARK, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9625467) with JURY DEMAND, filed by FIDELIA N. UZOUKWU ODUTOLA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(JOHNSON, ADRIAN) |
| Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Complaint #1 submitted by Adrian Johnson on April 30, 2019 contains an improper signature. Only the filing user is permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH A PROPER ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
