HARRELL v. GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
| RAVEN HARRELL |
| JOHN DOES 1-25 and GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
| 2:2019cv12273 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Steven C Mannion |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Scheduling Initial R16 Conference for 7/29/2019 10:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 2B before Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 6/19/2019. (spc, )
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.(BLAKELOCK, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. (BLAKELOCK, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAVEN HARRELL. GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP served on 5/14/2019, answer due 6/4/2019. (KAPLAN, BEN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RAVEN HARRELL ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9650348) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RAVEN HARRELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KAPLAN, BEN) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion added. (eu, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
