CUESTA et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: CLARIBEL CUESTA and SANTIAGO CUESTA
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, TARGET CORPORATION and XYZ CORPS. 1-10
Case Number: 2:2019cv12574
Filed: May 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Michael A Hammer
Referring Judge: Esther Salas
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (ps, )
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/26/2019 at 2:30 p.m. in Newark - Courtroom 2C before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 8/22/2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 6/28/2019. (jqb, )
June 4, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION. (MADDEN, THOMAS)
May 31, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by TARGET CORPORATION.(MADDEN, THOMAS)
May 28, 2019 Clerk's Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by TARGET CORPORATION has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 6/6/2019. (dam, )
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Target Corporation.. (MADDEN, THOMAS)
May 16, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, )
May 16, 2019 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, )
May 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TARGET CORPORATION from Superior Court of Hudson County, case number HUD L 1473 19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9670978), filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MADDEN, THOMAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CUESTA et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By: THOMAS M. MADDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ CORPS. 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLARIBEL CUESTA
Represented By: EVAN D. BAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SANTIAGO CUESTA
Represented By: EVAN D. BAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?