ESPICHAN v. ANDERSON
| NICOLA ARTURO ESPICHAN |
| WILLIAM J. ANDERSON |
| 2:2019cv13032 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Case; the Clerk of the Court shall re-open this matter for the purposes of this Order only; the petition #1 is Dismissed in its entirety as this Court lacks jurisdiction over the claims Petitioner has raised; the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the accompanying Opinion upon Petitioner by regular mail and shall Close the file. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 7/24/2019. (sm)
|
| Filing 4 OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 7/24/2019. (sm) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (sm) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Reopen Case. Motion set for 7/15/2019 before Judge Susan D. Wigenton. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number NEW039821 (sm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Reopen Case by NICOLA ARTURO ESPICHAN. (sm) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER, that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the petition or assessing a filing fee; Petitioner is informed that Administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened it is not subject to the statute of limitation, and that if the case is reopened it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 5/31/2019. (JB, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by NICOLA ARTURO ESPICHAN. No fee paid or IFP submitted. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-14, #2 Exhibit 15-24, #3 Envelope)(sm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ESPICHAN v. ANDERSON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NICOLA ARTURO ESPICHAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM J. ANDERSON | |
| Represented By: | JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
