ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY
| ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC. |
| VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY and arbnwk |
| 2:2019cv13308 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER Resetting Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware . Responses due by 8/5/2019, Replies due by 8/12/2019. Motion set for 8/19/2019 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 7/19/2019. (jr, )
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by RUSSELL LOUIS PORTER on behalf of ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC. (PORTER, RUSSELL) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Counterclaim by ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC..(FELLNER, GARY) |
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware . (PORTER, RUSSELL) |
| Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware . Motion set for 8/5/2019 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (JB, ) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY re #6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware (WHITMER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT in Support filed by VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY re #6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Frederick L. Whitmer) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(WHITMER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Delaware by VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(WHITMER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY identifying Veritiv Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (WHITMER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC. by VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(WHITMER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (JB, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC.. (FELLNER, GARY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9712155) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ULTRAFLEX SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(FELLNER, GARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
