LOPEZ v. TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA
| LILIANA LOPEZ |
| TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA, JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC CORPS 1-5 |
| 2:2019cv13502 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Steven C Mannion |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney KINGSUK BHATTACHARYA for LILIANA LOPEZ added.. (BHATTACHARYA, KINGSUK) |
Filing 4
ORDER Scheduling Initial R16 Conference in Arbitration Case for 9/4/2019 10:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 2B before Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 7/11/2019. (spc, )
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA.(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA. (MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA from HUDSON COUNT SUPERIOR COURT, case number L-1817-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9725226), filed by TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
