FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY v. RAND et al
FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY |
YAFFA RAND and PINCUS RAND |
2:2019cv13528 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stanley R Chesler |
Cathy L Waldor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY. YAFFA RAND served on 6/21/2019, answer due 7/12/2019. (ALONGI, PAUL) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY. PINCUS RAND served on 6/21/2019, answer due 7/12/2019. (ALONGI, PAUL) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PINCUS RAND, YAFFA RAND. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (JB, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (ak, ) |
Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY as to PINCUS RAND, YAFFA RAND. (ALONGI, PAUL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9726962), filed by FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ALONGI, PAUL) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/10/2019) (JB, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.