KINGSLAND DEVELOPMENT URBAN RENEWAL, LLC v. DAVIDZON RADIO INC. et al
KINGSLAND DEVELOPMENT URBAN RENEWAL, LLC |
Davidzon Media Inc. and Davidzon Radio Inc. |
2:2019cv13610 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Esther Salas |
Cathy L Waldor |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Esther Salas for all further proceedings. Judge William H. Walls no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 7/26/2019. (ti, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MARCUS AURELIUS NUSSBAUM on behalf of Davidzon Media Inc. (NUSSBAUM, MARCUS) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Davidzon Media Inc.. (NUSSBAUM, MARCUS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Davidzon Media Inc. of Joinder to the Notice of Removal of Davidzon Radio Inc. (NUSSBAUM, MARCUS) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Davidzon Radio Inc.. (NUSSBAUM, MARCUS) |
Case assigned to Judge William H. Walls and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (jr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Davidzon Radio Inc. from Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, case number BER-C-91-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9731907), filed by Davidzon Radio Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5)(NUSSBAUM, MARCUS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.