DESIR et al v. REID et al
| JEAN R. DESIR and WILENE DESIR |
| JOHN DOES 1-10, DEF CORPS., ABC COMPANIES 1-5, KENNIE REID, ROWE MACHINERY, INC., XYZ ENTITIES (1-5), DEF CORPS 1-5 and XYZ ENTITIES 1-5 |
| 2:2019cv13622 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from E.MICHAEL GARRETT, JR.. (GARRETT, E.) |
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/3/2019 at 10:30 a.m. in Newark - Courtroom 2C before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 10/1/2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 7/28/2019. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by KENNIE REID, ROWE MACHINERY, INC..(GARRETT, E.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ROWE MACHINERY, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, case number ESX-L-3036-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9733872), filed by ROWE MACHINERY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(GARRETT, E.) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
