LOPEZ ABREGO v. MCALNEENAM et al
MATEO LOPEZ ABREGO |
KEVIN MCALNEENAM, WILLIAM BARR, STEVEN AHRENDT, MARK MORGAN and KEVIN MCALEENAN |
2:2019cv13755 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Kevin McNulty |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL as moot. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 7/18/2019. (ld, ) |
Filing 8 Letter from AUSA Hajdarpasic Regarding Request for Dismissal of Action As Moot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Warrant of Removal/Deportation, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
Filing 7 USCA Case Number 19-2470 for #6 Notice of Appeal (USCA), filed by MATEO LOPEZ ABREGO. USCA Case Manager Desiree (Document Restricted - Court Only) (ca3dwb, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction,, by MATEO LOPEZ ABREGO. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0312-9770630. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit oRDER BEING APPEALED FROM)(CORNEHLS, GRANT) |
Filing 5 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN terminated. Attorney ENES HAJDARPASIC for STEVEN AHRENDT,ENES HAJDARPASIC for WILLIAM BARR,ENES HAJDARPASIC for KEVIN MCALNEENAM,ENES HAJDARPASIC for MARK MORGAN added.. (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the portions of the petition that seek review of petitioners order of removal and that seek an injunction against his removal are dismissed upon preliminary screening; ORDER denying #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; ORDER that within forty-five (45) days of this entry respondents shall file and serve an answer, etc; ORDER that within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the answer, petitioner may file a reply to the answer, etc. (Notice mailed to respondents and petitioner; notice emailed to AUSA.). Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 6/18/2019. (as, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by G. CORNEHLS on 06/14/2019 was submitted incorrectly as a MOTION. For future filings of Proposed Orders, please use the event Letter and attach the Proposed Order. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (as, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty. (jr) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by MATEO LOPEZ ABREGO re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (CORNEHLS, GRANT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by MATEO LOPEZ ABREGO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit Motion to Reopen, Part 1, #3 Exhibit Motion to Reopen, Part 2, #4 Exhibit Immigration Judge Decision, #5 Exhibit Petitioner's Brief on Appeal, Part 1, #6 Exhibit Petitioner's Brief on Appeal, Part 2, #7 Exhibit Board's Denial of Stay, #8 Exhibit Notice of Imminent Removal, #9 Exhibit DHS Opposition)(CORNEHLS, GRANT) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0312-9743419.), filed by Mateo Lopez Abrego. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Reopen, Part 1, #2 Exhibit Motion to Reopen, Part 2, #3 Exhibit Immigration Judge Decision, #4 Exhibit Petitioner's Brief on Appeal, Part 1, #5 Exhibit Petitioner's Brief on Appeal, Part 2, #6 Exhibit Board Decision Denying Stay, #7 Exhibit Notice of Imminent Removal, #8 Exhibit DHS Opposition)(CORNEHLS, GRANT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.