VALDEZ v. EAST COAST EGG FARMERS LLC et al
| PABLO VALDEZ |
| ROMAN RUIZ, RICHARD P. BLAS, MARIBEL BLAS and EAST COAST EGG FARMERS LLC |
| 2:2019cv15630 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by All Defendants.(BLANCH, MARIO) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PABLO VALDEZ. ROMAN RUIZ served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (NAYDENSKIY, GENNADIY) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PABLO VALDEZ. EAST COAST EGG FARMERS LLC served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (NAYDENSKIY, GENNADIY) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MARIBEL BLAS, RICHARD P. BLAS, EAST COAST EGG FARMERS LLC, ROMAN RUIZ. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARIBEL BLAS, RICHARD P. BLAS, EAST COAST EGG FARMERS LLC, ROMAN RUIZ ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9829868) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PABLO VALDEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(NAYDENSKIY, GENNADIY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
