BENTON v. SIMS et al
| EDMOND BENTON |
| MERRILL MAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MARC SIMS |
| 2:2019cv16157 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN J. SLOCUM on behalf of ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MERRILL MAIN, MARC SIMS (SLOCUM, STEPHEN)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules, a Notice of Electronic Filing of this Order on the State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Appellate Bureau ("the Bureau"), etc.; that if Respondents do not file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition, they shall file a full and complete answer to all claims asserted in the Petition within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this Order;etc. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 8/27/2019. (ld, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number NEW040279 dated 8/12/2019 (jr)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by EDMOND BENTON. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(bt, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
