JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ROSARIO et al
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. |
RDLC Services LLC, RAMON ROSARIO and Kachimbo Barber Shop |
2:2019cv16308 |
August 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Michael A Hammer |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RDLC Services LLC, RAMON ROSARIO. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
Filing 6 AO121 Copyright Form filed. (ams, ) |
Filing 5 Request for Summons to be Issued by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. as to RDLC Services LLC. (LONSTEIN, WAYNE) |
Filing 4 Request for Summons to be Issued by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. as to RAMON ROSARIO. (LONSTEIN, WAYNE) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding Copyright (LONSTEIN, WAYNE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. (LONSTEIN, WAYNE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RDLC Services LLC, RAMON ROSARIO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9866941), filed by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to deft. Rosario Ramon, #3 Summons as to Deft. RDLC Services LLC)(LONSTEIN, WAYNE) |
Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.