ROCHA-CARDENAS v. BARR et al
| DENNYS ROBERTO ROCHA-CARDENAS |
| JOHN TSOUKARIS, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JENNIFER HIGGINS, WILLIAM P. BARR and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN |
| 2:2019cv16315 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER, within 45 days after the date of entry of this Order, Respondent shall, electronically file a full and complete answer to said Petition, etc. ORDERED that respondents William Barr, Kevin McAleenan, John Tsoukaris,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Jennifer Higgins shall be terminated from this action. ORDERED that Petitioner may file and serve a reply in support of the Petition within 30 days after the answer is filed. Notices forwarded and mailed to Orlando Rodriguez, Warden of the Elizabeth Detention Center and United States Attorneys Office, at the following email address: USANJ-HabeasCasesusdoj.gov. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 8/29/2019. (vm )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number NEW040220.), filed by DENNYS ROBERTO ROCHA-CARDENAS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Index of Exhibits, #4 Exhibit A-B2, #5 Exhibit B3, #6 Exhibit B4, #7 Exhibit C-D, #8 Envelope)(ams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
