Johanna A. Mayer v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. et al
Johanna Mayer |
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, OPTUM360 SERVICES, INC., QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC and DOES 1 through 100 |
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION |
2:2019cv16543 |
August 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Michael A Hammer |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Clerk's Notice to Counsel. (gh, ) |
Member Case Transferred in on 8/9/19 from the Central District of California 5:19-cv-01029 for MDL 2904 AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION (gh, ) |
Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (gh, ) |
Filing 16 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 5:19-cv-01029. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 15 Transfer Order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2904, transferring case to USDC, District of New Jersey and assigned to Honorable Madeline Cox Arleo. Case transferred electronically. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 14 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 13 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-01091 DOC(KESx). Case transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:19-cv-01029 DOC(KESx). Signed by Judge David O. Carter (rn) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant American Medical Collection Agency. (et) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (et) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer, identifying Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Defendant Optum360 Services, Inc., and Defendant American Medical Collection Agency. (Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer. (Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer. (Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer. (Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer. (Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23866661 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Johanna Mayer. (Attorney Jerusalem F Beligan added to party Johanna Mayer(pty:pla))(Beligan, Jerusalem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.