TAYLOR v. ZUCKERBERG et al
| BRIAN L. TAYLOR and BRAS DOBANE |
| MARK ZUCKERBERG and FACEBOOK |
| 2:2019cv17282 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Joseph A Dickson |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Brian Taylor. (sm) |
| Filing 4 Returned Certified Card addressed to Brian L. Taylor -- unsigned (sm) |
Filing 3
OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is Granted; the Clerk is directed to file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed; Plaintiff is afforded 30 days to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies as set forth above; the Clerk shall mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff by regular and certified mail return receipt. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 10/4/2019. (sm)(n/m Cert. #7011 3500 0000 6746 4525)
|
| COMPLAINT against FACEBOOK, MARK ZUCKERBERG, filed by BRIAN L. TAYLOR. IFP Granted.(sm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by BRIAN L. TAYLOR. (ams, ) Modified on 8/28/2019 (ams, ). |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Letter, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(ams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
