HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. WR MANAGEMENT CO. et al
| HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| JEOUNGWON CHAE, WR MANAGEMENT CO. and SANG I CHAE |
| 2:2019cv17447 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.. JEOUNGWON CHAE served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019; SANG I CHAE served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019; WR MANAGEMENT CO. served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. (COUCH, BRYAN) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JEOUNGWON CHAE, SANG I CHAE, WR MANAGEMENT CO.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. identifying WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC as Corporate Parent.. (COUCH, BRYAN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JEOUNGWON CHAE, SANG I CHAE, WR MANAGEMENT CO. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9930736), filed by HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(COUCH, BRYAN) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (eu, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
