DADIGE v. CGI GROUP, INC. et al
Plaintiff: GAYATRI DADIGE
Defendant: CGI GROUP, INC. and A to C entities
Case Number: 2:2019cv17969
Filed: September 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Leda D Wettre
Referring Judge: Susan D Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER - Per counsel's request, the Telephone Conference set for 10/30/2019 is rescheduled for 12/2/2019 at 4:00 pm before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Once all parties are on the phone, please call Chambers at (973) 645-3574.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 10/25/2019. (kd)
October 24, 2019 Filing 9 Letter from Law Office of Susheela Verma. (VERMA, SUSHEELA)
October 4, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by CGI GROUP, INC..(OMAR, SHAREEF)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER - A Telephone Conference is set for 10/30/2019 at 2:30 pm before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Once all parties are on the phone, please call Chambers at (973)645-3574.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 9/30/2019. (kd)
September 18, 2019 Filing 6 Letter from William McLane. (MCLANE, WILLIAM)
September 17, 2019 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CGI GROUP, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/4/2019. (JB, )
September 13, 2019 Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (eu, )
September 13, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by SHAREEF M. OMAR on behalf of CGI GROUP, INC. (OMAR, SHAREEF)
September 13, 2019 Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (MCLANE, WILLIAM)
September 13, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM P. MCLANE on behalf of CGI GROUP, INC. (MCLANE, WILLIAM)
September 13, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CGI GROUP, INC.. (MCLANE, WILLIAM)
September 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CGI GROUP, INC. from Superior Court of Middlesex County, NJ, case number MID-L-5912-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9961165), filed by CGI GROUP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Adverse Party, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(MCLANE, WILLIAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DADIGE v. CGI GROUP, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GAYATRI DADIGE
Represented By: SUSHEELA VERMA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CGI GROUP, INC.
Represented By: SHAREEF M. OMAR
Represented By: WILLIAM P. MCLANE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A to C entities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?