CALABRESE et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
JAMES CALABRESE, GREGORY CABANILLAS and MATTHEW MECHANIC |
RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
2:2019cv18371 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Leda D Wettre |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Motion 16 for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice submitted by Paul Lantis on 11/14/2019 contains improper signatures. Only Registered Users are permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE CERTIFICATIONS WITH PROPER SIGNATURES. You can use the event Exhibit to Document and attach the signature pages. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (sms) (sms) |
Set Deadlines as to #16 Defendant's MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion set for 12/16/2019 before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk's Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dam, ) |
Filing 18 BRIEF in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs re #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, #14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration for Opt-In Plaintiffs Corey Wims and Shyidah Johnson (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. re #16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (LANTIS, PAUL) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Heather Richardson, #2 Certification of Theane Evangelis, #3 Certification of Joshua Lipshutz, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(LANTIS, PAUL) |
Filing 15 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action by Shane Golden (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration for Opt-In Plaintiffs Corey Wims and Shyidah Johnson. Motion set for 12/2/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration for Opt-In Plaintiffs Corey Wims and Shyidah Johnson by RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declararion of M. Chan, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(LANTIS, PAUL) |
|
Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Motion RESET for 12/2/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Filing of Shayidah Johnson's Consent to Join Collective Action (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 11 Letter from Paul C. Lantis. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Letter from co-counsel)(LANTIS, PAUL) |
Filing 10 Letter from Plaintiffs' Counsel Requesting Adjournment re Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,. (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Motion set for 11/18/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(LANTIS, PAUL) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Raiser, LLC on 10/2/2019, filed by GREGORY CABANILLAS, JAMES CALABRESE, MATTHEW MECHANIC. (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Uber Technologies, Inc. on 10/2/2019, filed by GREGORY CABANILLAS, JAMES CALABRESE, MATTHEW MECHANIC. (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action by Corey Wims (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by MATTHEW MECHANIC of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by GREGORY CABANILLAS of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by JAMES CALABRESE of Filing of Consent to Join Collective Action (NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RAISER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9990003) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JAMES CALABRESE, MATTHEW MECHANIC, GREGORY CABANILLAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(NESMITH, ROOSEVELT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.