CARDENAS v. BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL et al
| ANGEL CARDENAS |
| A Caring Doctor (New Jersey), P.C. d/b/a Banfield Pet Hospital, BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL, MEDICAL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C. |
| 2:2019cv18632 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Beth A. Ebersole, Esq. to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number 0312-10139109.) (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Kimberly J. Overbaugh, Esq. to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number 0312-10139091.) (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Thomas R. Davies, Esq. to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number 0312-10139062.) (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
Filing 17
TEXT ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2020 at 3:00 p.m. in Newark - Courtroom 2C before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 1/13/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/25/2019. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 15 Letter re #14 Amended Complaint, #12 Letter. (WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C., MEDICAL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC., filed by ANGEL CARDENAS.(WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #8 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Thomas R. Davies, Esq., Kimberly J. Overbaugh, Esq. and Beth A. Ebersole, Esq.; counsel shall make payments to the New Jersey Lawyers Fund for Client Protection; counsel shall each pay $150.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/20/2019. (sm)
|
| Filing 13 Letter from Mark S. Haubenstock, Esq.. (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 12 Letter from Locksley O. Wade re #10 Answer to Complaint. (WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C.. (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C..(HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 9 Certification of Thomas R. Davies on behalf of All Defendants Re #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Kimberly J. Overbaugh, #2 Certification of Beth A. Ebersole)(HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion set for 12/2/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (Ti) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Motion For Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #8 submitted by MARK HAUBENSTOCK on 10/28/2019 contains improper signatures. Only Registered Users are permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH THE PROPER SCANNED SIGNATURES OF Thomas R. Davies, Kimberly J. Overbaugh, and Beth A. Ebersole. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (Ti) |
| Filing 8 Motion For Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Thomas R. Davies, Esq., #2 Certification of Kimberly J. Overbaugh, Esq., #3 Certification of Beth A. Ebersole, Esq., #4 Certification of Mark S. Haubenstock, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) Modified on 10/30/2019 (Ti). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK S HAUBENSTOCK on behalf of All Defendants (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK S HAUBENSTOCK on behalf of All Defendants (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C., BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/11/2019. (lag, ) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants Banfield Pet Hospital and A Caring Doctor (New Jersey), P.C. d/b/a Banfield Pet Hospital.. (HAUBENSTOCK, MARK) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANGEL CARDENAS. A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C. served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit additinal service in NJ)(WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANGEL CARDENAS. BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to A CARING DOCTOR (NEW JERSEY), P.C., BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jd, ) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A Caring Doctor (New Jersey), P.C. d/b/a Banfield Pet Hospital, BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10007931) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ANGEL CARDENAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(WADE, LOCKSLEY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
