HOPKINS v. COLLECTO, INC. et al
| RANDY HOPKINS |
| COLLECTO, INC. d/b/a EOS CCA, JOHN DOES 1 to 10, US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. and COLLECTO, INC. |
| 2:2019cv18661 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LAWRENCE J. BARTEL, III on behalf of COLLECTO, INC., US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by COLLECTO, INC.. COLLECTO, INC. waiver sent on 10/11/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.. US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. waiver sent on 10/11/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to COLLECTO, INC., US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, ) |
| Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (ps, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COLLECTO, INC. d/b/a EOS CCA, JOHN DOES 1 to 10, US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10008719) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RANDY HOPKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KIM, YONGMOON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
