KOROLEV v. BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION et al
ALEXANDER KOROLEV |
Boasso, John Does 1-5 and BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION |
2:2019cv19256 |
October 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Joseph A Dickson |
Brian R Martinotti |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint Answer and Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION.(NESSE, MICHAEL) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES M. MCDONNELL on behalf of BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION (MCDONNELL, JAMES) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boasso. (NESSE, MICHAEL) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/13/2019. (ams, ) |
Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney EVAN L. GOLDMAN for ALEXANDER KOROLEV added. (NESSE, MICHAEL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Boasso from New Jersey Superior Court, case number ESX-L-006197-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10056043), filed by Boasso. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Compliance, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(NESSE, MICHAEL) |
Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.