SCOTT v. SLAUGHTER et al
| JAMES H. SCOTT |
| JAMES SLAUGHTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2019cv20962 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall send Petitioner a blank habeas form for state prisoners, AO 241 (modified):DNJ-Habeas-008(Rev.01-2014); Petitioner shall notify the Court in writing within 45 days of the date of this Order whether he wishes to have his Petition ruled on as filed or whether he wishes to withdraw his Petition and submit one all-inclusive 2254 petition; to the extent Petitioner wishes to withdraw his original petition and submit one all-inclusive amended petition, he must submit the amended petition on the correctform within 45 days of the date of this Courts Order; the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this action pending Petitioners response to the Mason notice; the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 1/21/2020. (sm)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES H. SCOTT. No IPF or Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Cover Letter)(sm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
