SIMON v. SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY et al
| JOAN SIMON |
| JOHN DOES 1-3, SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY, GUENDOLYN FARRALES and JANE DOES 1-5 |
| 2:2019cv21271 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, D.E. 3, and Plaintiff then filed an Amended Complaint, D.E. 6. It does not appear that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint was filed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). If Plaintiff files the appropriate motion, or obtains Defendants written consent, as to the Amended Complaint, the Court will terminate the pending motion to dismiss, D.E. 3, with leave for Defendant to refile its motion as to the Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 2/5/2020. (ro, )
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by JOAN SIMON.(PEDUTO, GENESIS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER; granting #4 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re 3 MOTION to Dismiss; the motion day will be now set as February 18, 2020. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 1/22/2020. (sms)
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion reset for 2/18/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms)
|
|
Filing 4
Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss . (PEDUTO, GENESIS)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion set for 2/3/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Certification of James K. Webber, #3 Exhibit A to Certification, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Text of Proposed Order, #11 Certificate of Service)(WEBBER, JAMES)
|
|
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 submitted by GUENDOLYN FARRALES, SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 1/8/2020. (sm)
|
|
Filing 2
Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to St. Dominic Academy and Guendolyn Farrales.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(WEBBER, JAMES)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GUENDOLYN FARRALES, SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY from Superior Court of NJ, Hudson County, Law Division, case number HUD-L-004248-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10173996), filed by GUENDOLYN FARRALES, SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint & CIS, #2 Exhibit Track Assignment, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Affidavits of Service, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(WEBBER, JAMES)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (ak, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
