ACKERMAN et al v. WOLFF et al
| U.S. TRUSTEE, ARCHER & GREINER, PC, DAVID WOLFF and LOUIS GALIANO, DMD |
| CHERYL ACKERMAN |
| 2:2020cv00361 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
OPINION & ORDER that the motion to reopen the case #4 is Denied; because there is no viable case, the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel #5 is Denied. The file shall remain closed. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 2/21/2020. (sm)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION/PETITION for Pro Bono Counsel by CHERYL ACKERMAN. (ams, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION/PETITION to Re-open case by CHERYL ACKERMAN. (ams, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER; dismissing the Notice of Appeal and this matter be and the same is hereby dismissed under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8003 for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009; etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 1/24/2020. (sms)
|
| Filing 2 Certification of Failure to File Designation of Record Re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Transmittal Letter)(sms) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 17-17032 (RG), filed by CHERYL ACKERMAN. (Attachments: #1 Order being Appealed, #2 Transmittal)(ld, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
