SALAAM v. SINGH et al
| Ms. NAJAH A SALAAM |
| JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10 and JASPAL SINGH |
| 2:2020cv00739 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Stanley R Chesler |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Answer Due Deadline Update - The Answer Due Date generated from the filing of #3 Summons Returned Executed has been updated to 2/27/20 as the incorrect event was chosen to file the document and Defendant has 21 days (not 60 days) to respond to the Complaint. (jc, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NAJAH A SALAAM. JASPAL SINGH served on 2/6/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. (BYOUN, STEVE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JASPAL SINGH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JASPAL SINGH, JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10299200) with JURY DEMAND, filed by NAJAH A SALAAM.(jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
