SOUSA v. PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION, LOCAL 1456 et al
PEDRO SOUSA |
PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION, LOCAL 1456, JOHN OATES and RAYMOND GORSKI |
2:2020cv01078 |
January 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated. (nic, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by RAYMOND GORSKI, JOHN OATES, PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION, LOCAL 1456 (MOGILA, STEPHEN) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Attorney, Antonio Inacio, is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (qa, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by RAYMOND GORSKI, JOHN OATES, PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION, LOCAL 1456 from Superior Court of New Jersey - Law Division: Civil Part, Union County, case number UNN-L-360-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10345265), filed by RAYMOND GORSKI, JOHN OATES, PORT POLICE & GUARDS UNION, LOCAL 1456. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint and Order to Show Cause, #2 Exhibit B- Judge Ciarrocca Scheduling Letter, #3 Exhibit C- PPGU By-laws, #4 Exhibit D- Consent of Defendants, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(MOGILA, STEPHEN) |
Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.