ARCE v. CEESAY et al
| JAVIER ARCE |
| ESURANCE (NJ), MUSA CEESAY, JANE ROE and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2020cv01179 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1364 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10355604) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Javier Arce.(BYOUN, STEVE) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Complaint #1 submitted by Steve Byoun, esq. on February 3, 2020 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records for this case. Please update your mailing address at www.pacer.gov and make update via the Manage My Account tab. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information - Parties are to be entered in all capital letters without addresses . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
