PETTEWAY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
| KAREN PETTEWAY |
| XYZ CORP., (said names being fictitious), ABC, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and XYZ CORP. |
| 2:2020cv02713 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 6/9/2020 at 11:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 9 before Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 4/1/20. (LM, ) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by WAL-MART STORES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(PETERS, NADA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WAL-MART STORES, INC.. (PETERS, NADA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WAL-MART STORES, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County, case number UNN-L-000503-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10543468), filed by WAL-MART STORES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, #2 Exhibit B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(PETERS, NADA) |
| Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
