ADAM v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
| DR. NABIL ADAM |
| RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2020cv05586 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (LYONS, MARTIN) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID DANA CRAMER on behalf of RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (CRAMER, DAVID) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by CAITLIN PETRY CASCINO on behalf of RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (CASCINO, CAITLIN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MARTIN TREVOR LYONS on behalf of RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (LYONS, MARTIN) |
| Clerk's Text Order - The document #8 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/13/2020. (dam, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NABIL ADAM. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY served on 5/7/2020, answer due 5/28/2020. (NOBLE, GREGORY) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Re #3 Affidavit of Service. If filing a Return of Service or Affidavit of Service indicating the date of service of the Summons and the Complaint, please do not use this event. The correct event is SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. This message is for informational purposes only, and there is no further action required. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (dam, ) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Rutgers on May 7, 2020, filed by NABIL ADAM. (NOBLE, GREGORY) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10777474) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DR. NABIL ADAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(NOBLE, GREGORY) Modified on 5/6/2020 (dam, ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ADAM v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY | |
| Represented By: | DAVID DANA CRAMER |
| Represented By: | MARTIN TREVOR LYONS |
| Represented By: | CAITLIN PETRY CASCINO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DR. NABIL ADAM | |
| Represented By: | GREGORY B. NOBLE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
