BONILLA-BONILLA et al v. KALKBRENNER et al
| LUIS BONILLA-BONILLA and ANGELA DAYANA BONILLA |
| GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER, GEICO, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, M.N.O. CORP 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and A.B.C. CORP. 1-10 |
| arbnwk |
| 2:2020cv05611 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Support filed by All Plaintiffs re #6 MOTION to Remand (CARILLI, ALBERT) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF in Opposition filed by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER re #6 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification in support of opposition, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Certificate of Service)(REITER, LORNE) |
Filing 8
ORDER that plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is adjourned from 6/15/2020 until 7/6/2020. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 6/9/2020. (sm)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Lorne Reiter. (REITER, LORNE) |
| Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 6/15/2020 before Judge Claire C. Cecchi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Brief memorandumlaw, #2 Certification declaration of facts)(CARILLI, ALBERT) |
| Filing 5 GEICO ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against A.B.C. CORP. 1-10, BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., ANGELA DAYANA BONILLA, LUIS BONILLA-BONILLA, JOHN DOE 1-10, CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER, M.N.O. CORP 1-10, arbnwk by GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY.(PUPPELO, MICHAEL)NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court. |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER.(REITER, LORNE) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER. (REITER, LORNE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER civil cover sheet (REITER, LORNE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER from Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, Bergen County, case number BER-L-1949-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10779809), filed by BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., CHRISTOPHER KALKBRENNER.(REITER, LORNE) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Guide to Searching and Entering Parties at https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/files/PartyNameGuideforAttorneys.pdf (jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
