HOPKINS v. ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. et al
| RANDY HOPKINS |
| ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOHN DOES 1 to 10 and JOSEPH LEMBO |
| 2:2020cv06733 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Discovery Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 7/20/2020. (ams, )
|
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please note that D.E. 14 filed by the Clerk's office on 7/20/2020 was docketed in error. Please disregard. (ams, ) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Letter; Alexander Rabinowitz replaces Steven Hafif as counsel of record for defendants, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 7/17/2020. (ams, )
|
| Filing 12 Letter from Alexander Rabinowitz. (RABINOWITZ, ALEXANDER) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by ALEXANDER RABINOWITZ on behalf of ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOSEPH LEMBO (RABINOWITZ, ALEXANDER) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Barry G. Margolis, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 7/9/2020. (ams, )
|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RANDY HOPKINS. JOSEPH LEMBO waiver sent on 6/3/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. (KIM, YONGMOON) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RANDY HOPKINS. CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS waiver sent on 6/3/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. (KIM, YONGMOON) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RANDY HOPKINS. ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. waiver sent on 6/3/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. (KIM, YONGMOON) |
| Set Deadlines as to #6 Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 8/3/2020 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) |
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOSEPH LEMBO. (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A.Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(HAFIF, STEVEN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by STEVEN HAFIF on behalf of ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOSEPH LEMBO (HAFIF, STEVEN) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: The pending motion for pro hac vice admission (ECF No. #3 ) is denied without prejudice. The motion was not made on behalf of the attorney seeking admission by the listed counsel of record, who must agree to be served with all notices, orders and pleadings. Furthermore, the certification of the attorney seeking admission lacks his handwritten signature, which is required for submissions by all those who are not admitted attorneys in the District of New Jersey. Additionally, the attorney seeking admission has not certified, among other things, that no discipline of any kind has previously been imposed on said attorney in any jurisdiction. Also, the motion lacks a certified statement disclosing each and every bar in which the applicant is a member in good standing including the year of admission and the name and address of the official or office maintaining the roll of such members of its bar, or in lieu thereof certificates of good standing issued by the person or office maintaining the roll of the members of its bar. The aforementioned list of deficiencies is not necessarily complete, and thus counsel should refer to the Local Civil Rules for the District of New Jersey (including Local Civil Rule 101.1(c) and Local Civil Rule 5.2(12)(b)) and to Judge Kiel's Civil Case Management Order (including paragraph 5 thereof), and is granted leave to have a formal motion filed on his behalf by an admitted attorney. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 6/27/2020. (as, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOSEPH LEMBO. (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support of Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order of Admission Pro Hac Vice)(HAFIF, STEVEN) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 7/20/2020 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOSEPH LEMBO. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., CHRISTOPHER DEBBAS, JOHN DOES 1 to 10, JOSEPH LEMBO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10885510) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RANDY HOPKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KIM, YONGMOON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
