GEIGER et al v. D.M.Z., INC. et al
| JOANNA KRUPA, CARISSA ROSARIO, BRENDA GEIGER, DENISE MILANI, LUCY PINDER and ABIGAIL RATCHFORD |
| BREATHLESS, INC., D.M.Z., INC. d/b/a BREATHLESS GENTLEMEN'S CLUB and D.M.Z., INC. doing business as BREATHLESS GENTLEMEN'S CLUB |
| 2:2020cv07190 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #9 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by D.M.Z., INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/20/2020. (bt, ) |
| Filing 9 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to defendant D.M.Z., Inc.. Attorney JOSEPH H. TRINGALI for D.M.Z., INC. added. (TRINGALI, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH H. TRINGALI on behalf of D.M.Z., INC. (TRINGALI, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by BREATHLESS, INC. re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (SCHMIDT, JOHN) |
| Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 8/3/2020 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF in Opposition filed by BRENDA GEIGER, JOANNA KRUPA, DENISE MILANI, LUCY PINDER, ABIGAIL RATCHFORD, CARISSA ROSARIO re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of William J. Pinilis)(PINILIS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BREATHLESS, INC., D.M.Z., INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 8/3/2020 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by BREATHLESS, INC.. Responses due by 7/20/2020 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Chris Kontos, #2 Brief Brief in support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Order)(SCHMIDT, JOHN) |
| Filing 3 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (bt, ) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by BREATHLESS, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/20/2020. (th, ) |
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Breathless, Inc.. Attorney JOHN H. SCHMIDT, JR for BREATHLESS, INC. added. (SCHMIDT, JOHN) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BREATHLESS, INC., D.M.Z., INC. d/b/a BREATHLESS GENTLEMEN'S CLUB ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10936324) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CARISSA ROSARIO, LUCY PINDER, BRENDA GEIGER, DENISE MILANI, JOANNA KRUPA, ABIGAIL RATCHFORD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PINILIS, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
