CIAPPI v. XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN
| JOHN CIAPPI |
| XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN, JOHN DOE (1-100) and XYZ CORP. (1-100) |
| 2:2020cv07362 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from Jeffrey M. Halkovich. (HALKOVICH, JEFFREY) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting defendant an extension of time through 8/24/2020 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 6/24/2020. (sm)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Fotini Karamboulis. (KARAMBOULIS, FOTINI) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, ) |
| Filing 4 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN. (KARAMBOULIS, FOTINI) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN identifying XPO Logistics, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (KARAMBOULIS, FOTINI) |
| Filing 2 Certification on behalf of XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN Re #1 Notice of Removal,. (KARAMBOULIS, FOTINI) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN from Superior Court of NJ, Bergen County, case number 002841-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10955154), filed by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. MEDICAL PLAN.(KARAMBOULIS, FOTINI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
