CORDWELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
CADE CORDWELL |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
2:2020cv07676 |
June 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Claire C Cecchi |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CADE CORDWELL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dam, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CORDWELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CADE CORDWELL | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.