BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. MOTEL PARTNERS, LLC et al
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. |
TOM PARFITT, MOTEL PARTNERS, LLC and JAMES BRENT HAYES |
2:2020cv10258 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 9/25/2020. (ld, ) |
Filing 5 Proposed Order and Notice of Dismissal by BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.. (COUCH, BRYAN) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.. All Defendants. (COUCH, BRYAN) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JAMES BRENT HAYES, MOTEL PARTNERS, LLC, TOM PARFITT. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. identifying WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC as Corporate Parent.. (COUCH, BRYAN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES BRENT HAYES, MOTEL PARTNERS, LLC, TOM PARFITT ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11187322), filed by BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(COUCH, BRYAN) |
Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.