INGRAHAM v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. et al
| KISHA INGRAHAM |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2020cv10322 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 10/23/2020. To join the conference call, dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817#. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/5/2020. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against JOHN DOES 1-10 by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP..(BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.. (BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. from ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number ESX-L-4975-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11193966), filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit S&C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
