TSMA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC. et al
| TSMA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. |
| TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC. and SEAN NOLAN |
| MIKE SACHS, BRYAN GOTTHOFFER, DANIEL SCHULMANN and ANTHONY VISCOVICH |
| 2:2020cv11088 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Letter from Lawrence C. Weiner. (WEINER, LAWRENCE)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice counsel, ALAN A. HELLER, ESQ., has been added to receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Pursuant to L.Civ.R. 101.1, only local counsel are entitled to sign and file papers, enter appearances and receive payments on judgments, decrees or orders. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 11
Notice of Request by Pro Hac Vice Alan Heller, Esq. to receive Notices of Electronic Filings. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 150 receipt number ANJDC-11476212.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Adm Fee w Order, #2 Exhibit NJ Lawyers Fund)(WEINER, LAWRENCE)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS ISSUED as to BRYAN GOTTHOFFER, MIKE SACHS, DANIEL SCHULMANN, ANTHONY VISCOVICH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 9
Request for Summons to be Issued by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC. as to DANIEL SCHULMANN, ANTHONY VISCOVICH, BRYAN GOTTHOFFER, MIKE SACHS. (THARNEY, MATTHEW)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Plaintiff a two-week extension of the time until October 20, 2020 to file its response to the Counterclaim (D.E. No. 4).. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/29/2020. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 7
Letter from Lawrence Weiner, Esq. re #4 Amended Document. (WEINER, LAWRENCE)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Alan Heller, Esq.. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/22/2020. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(WEINER, LAWRENCE)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED DOCUMENT by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC.. AMENDED ANSWER WITH COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT. (THARNEY, MATTHEW)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 10/19/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC..(THARNEY, MATTHEW)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(THARNEY, MATTHEW)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, case number BER-L-4217-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11245383), filed by SEAN NOLAN, TS OF KINGS HIGHWAY INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - D, #2 Certificate of Service)(THARNEY, MATTHEW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
