SMITH v. CALEX EXPRESS et al
ANTHONY SMITH |
CALEX EXPRESS, XYZ COMPANIES I-V, JOHN DOES I-V and ROBERT J KUKLA |
2:2020cv11196 |
August 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Joseph A Dickson |
Brian R Martinotti |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Joint Discovery Plan by CALEX EXPRESS, ROBERT J KUKLA.(GROSS, LAURENCE) |
Filing 5 Rule 26 Initial Disclosures by ANTHONY SMITH. (MAZZA, ANTHONY) Modified on 8/31/2020 (dam, ). |
Filing 4 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson on 8/26/20. (jbb) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by CALEX EXPRESS, ROBERT J KUKLA.(GROSS, LAURENCE) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CALEX EXPRESS. (dam, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CALEX ISCS, INC., ROBERT J KUKLA from SUPERIOR COURT OF HUDSON COUNTY, case number L-002704-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11250623), filed by CALEX ISCS, INC., ROBERT J KUKLA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, #3 Statement DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, #4 Certificate of Service)(GROSS, LAURENCE) Modified on 8/24/2020 (dam, ). |
Case assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson. (jr) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.