M.H. et al. v. OMEGLE.COM LLC
J. H. and M. H. |
OMEGLE.COM LLC |
2:2020cv11294 |
August 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant Omegle.com's time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint up to and including November 20, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 10/21/20. (jc, ) |
Answer Due Deadline Update - The #4 Stipulation filed by the parties has been GRANTED. The answer due date for OMEGLE.COM LLC has been set for 11/20/2020. (jc, ) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Extending time to Answer/Plead by All Defendants. (PRUSINOWSKI, JAMES) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES THOMAS PRUSINOWSKI on behalf of All Defendants (PRUSINOWSKI, JAMES) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to OMEGLE.COM LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OMEGLE.COM LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11255722) with JURY DEMAND, filed by M.H. AND J.H., ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, C.H.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(NAPPI, HILLARY) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.