STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY et al
| STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY |
| TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY, TAHA VIP LIMO, INC., AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, LYFT, INC. and AHMAD R. BRUNSON |
| 2:2020cv12218 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1364 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY re #5 First MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Certificate of Service)(LIEBERMAN, ANN DEE) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF in Opposition filed by LYFT, INC. re #5 First MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Counsel, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - Letter Regarding Service, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Superior Court Docket, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E - Despaigne Complaint, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F - Despaigne Amended Complaint, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G - March 24, 2020 Standing Order, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H - April 17, 2020 Standing Order, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I - May 22, 2020 Standing Order, #11 Exhibit Exhibit J - August 17, 2020 Standing Order)(SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 First MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 10/19/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand by STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit, #4 Brief, #5 Text of Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(LIEBERMAN, ANN DEE) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by LYFT, INC..(SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/23/2020. (ld, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant, Travelers. Attorney DOUGLAS V. SANCHEZ for LYFT, INC.,DOUGLAS V. SANCHEZ for TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY added. (SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by LYFT, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/23/2020. (ld, ) |
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Lyft Inc.. Attorney DOUGLAS V. SANCHEZ for LYFT, INC. added. (SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
| Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LYFT, INC. from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY - UNION COUNTY, case number UNN-L-1990-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11295856), filed by LYFT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet FEDERAL CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET WITH ATTACHMENT, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT D, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT E, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT F, #8 Exhibit EXHIBIT G, #9 Certificate of Service)(SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
