KERTESZ v. COLONY TIRE CORPORATION et al
ERIK KERTESZ |
CHARLES CREIGHTON, SCOTT CREIGHTON, COLONY TIRE CORPORATION, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10 |
2:2020cv12364 |
September 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
John Michael Vazquez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 First MOTION for Leave to File Sur Reply by ERIK KERTESZ. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Brief, #3 Declaration Tyrone Blackburn Declaration, #4 Supplement, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Declaration Erik Kertesz Declaration, #14 Declaration Scott Creighton Declaration)(BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Filing 10 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by COLONY TIRE CORPORATION, CHARLES CREIGHTON, SCOTT CREIGHTON re #2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Exhibits)(DEBLASIO, JOSEPH) |
Filing 9 Letter re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion,,,,. (BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ERIK KERTESZ re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion,,,, Certificate of Service of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by ERIK KERTESZ re #2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses (Attachments: #1 Declaration Erik Kertesz Declaration In opposition to Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue, #2 Exhibit Attachment A, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue, #3 Exhibit Attachment B, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue, #4 Exhibit Attachment C, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue, #5 Exhibit Attachment D, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue, #6 Exhibit Attachment E, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue, #7 Exhibit Attachment F, for Erik Kertesz's Declaration in opposition to Defendants motion to transfer venue)(BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Filing 6 Letter from Joseph C. DeBlasio to the Hon. James B. Clark, III, U.S.M.J. re #2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses, #1 Notice of Removal,. (DEBLASIO, JOSEPH) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Letter requesting an extension of time until 10/1/2020 to file Opposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/21/2020. (ams, ) |
Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Defendants Motion to Transfer by ERIK KERTESZ. (BLACKBURN, TYRONE) |
Set Deadlines as to #4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Defendants Motion to Transfer. Motion set for 10/19/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses. Motion set for 10/5/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses. Responses due by 9/21/2020 Replies due by 9/28/2020. Motion set for 10/5/2020 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ro, ) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COLONY TIRE CORPORATION. (DEBLASIO, JOSEPH) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and for Extension of Time to Answer or Present Defenses by COLONY TIRE CORPORATION, CHARLES CREIGHTON, SCOTT CREIGHTON. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration Scott Creighton Dec. and Exhibits A-O, #3 Exhibit Continuing Exhibits P-O to Scott Creighton Decl., #4 Declaration Charles Creighton Dec., #5 Certificate of Service)(DEBLASIO, JOSEPH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COLONY TIRE CORPORATION, CHARLES CREIGHTON, SCOTT CREIGHTON from Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, case number ESX-L-005237-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11314031), filed by COLONY TIRE CORPORATION, CHARLES CREIGHTON, SCOTT CREIGHTON. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Compliance, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(DEBLASIO, JOSEPH) |
Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.