BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG v. 3M COMPANY
BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG |
3M COMPANY and MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING, CO. |
2:2020cv12551 |
September 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Claire C Cecchi |
James B Clark |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG. All Defendants. (LONDON, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Complaint by BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG. (LONDON, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to 3M COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.). ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number BNJDC-11341990) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Borough of Hopatcong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LONDON, MICHAEL) |
Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information - Parties are to be entered in all capital letters. Also, add f/k/a name separately as an alias, not included in the name. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.