RUE v. MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING INVESTORS LLC
| JOHN D RUE and JOHN RUE |
| MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING INVESTORS, LLC d/b/a MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING and MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING INVESTORS LLC doing business as MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING |
| 2:2020cv12612 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING INVESTORS LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information - d/b/a, a/k/a, etc. are entered as an alias, not part of the name. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Guide to Entering Parties https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/files/PartyNameGuideforAttorneys.pdf (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING INVESTORS, LLC d/b/a MOUNTAIN VIEW CROSSING ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11345956) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOHN D RUE.(EDWARDS, SARAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
