RAFAEI v. NETJETS SERVICES, INC. et al
| ISLAM RAFAEI |
| XYZ CORPORATION 1 THROUGH 10, NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS AVIATION, INC and NETJETS, INC. |
| 2:2020cv12736 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Proposed Consent Order Changing Venue by ISLAM RAFAEI. (Attachments: #1 Statement Cover Letter Explaining Proposed Consent Order)(VRHOVC, RICHARD) Modified on 11/4/2020 (dam). |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: At the request of defense counsel, the Scheduling Conference scheduled for October 22, 2020 is adjourned to November 19, 2020 at 3:30 p.m. Counsel shall join the call by dialing 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817#. The proposed joint discovery plan is now due by November 16, 2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/16/2020. (TAD)
|
| Filing 9 Letter from NetJets Defendants Requesting Adjournment and Extension of Time re 5 Text Order, 6 Text Order. (HARRINGTON, DAVID) Modified on 10/15/2020 (dam). |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS, INC. identifying NetJets Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (HARRINGTON, DAVID) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS, INC..(HARRINGTON, DAVID) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: The Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2020 will be held at 10:00 a.m. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/5/2020. (TIME CHANGE ONLY)(jqb, )
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2020 at 2:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 10/21/2020. To join the conference call, dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817#. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/5/2020. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 4 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney DOUGLAS HARRY AMSTER and GENE KYLE KASKIW terminated. Attorney DAVID J. HARRINGTON,HARRISON DEAN SQUIRES for NETJETS AVIATION, INC,DAVID J. HARRINGTON,HARRISON DEAN SQUIRES for NETJETS SERVICES, INC.,DAVID J. HARRINGTON,HARRISON DEAN SQUIRES for NETJETS, INC. added.. (HARRINGTON, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants NetJets Inc., NetJets Services, Inc. and NetJets Aviation,Inc... (KASKIW, GENE) |
| Clerk's Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/6/2020. (dam, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by GENE KYLE KASKIW on behalf of NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS, INC. (KASKIW, GENE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS, INC. from SUPERIOR COURT OF ESSEX COUNTY case number ESX-L-005523-20. (Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11359164), filed by NETJETS SERVICES, INC., NETJETS AVIATION, INC, NETJETS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Certificate of Service)(AMSTER, DOUGLAS) Modified on 9/15/2020 (dam, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
