ROSARIO v. ARY et al
LUCRECIA M ROSARIO |
STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., DANIEL ARY, JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-5 |
2:2020cv13218 |
September 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Katharine S Hayden |
Cathy L Waldor |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tjg, ) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC..(COLE, CHARLES) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DANIEL ARY, STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC. re #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit (to Document), #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (aty) (COLE, CHARLES) |
Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by DANIEL ARY, STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC.. (COLE, CHARLES) |
Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC. identifying none as Corporate Parent.. (COLE, CHARLES) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., DANIEL ARY from Superior Court of Middlesex County, case number MID-L-6479-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11404116), filed by STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., DANIEL ARY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint))(COLE, CHARLES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.