PETERSON v. IMMUNOMEDICS, INC. et al
| JAMES PETERSON |
| IMMUNOMEDICS, INC., ROBERT AZELBY, BEHZAD AGHAZADEH, KHALID ISLAM, PETER BARTON HUTT, SCOTT CANUTE, BARBARA DUNCAN and DR. CHARLES BAUM |
| 2:2020cv13655 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BEHZAD AGHAZADEH, ROBERT AZELBY, CHARLES BAUM, SCOTT CANUTE, BARBARA DUNCAN, PETER BARTON HUTT, IMMUNOMEDICS, INC., KHALID ISLAM. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JAMES PETERSON. (HALPER, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by JAMES PETERSON as to BEHZAD AGHAZADEH, ROBERT AZELBY, CHARLES BAUM, SCOTT CANUTE, BARBARA DUNCAN, PETER BARTON HUTT, IMMUNOMEDICS, INC., KHALID ISLAM. (HALPER, ZACHARY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BEHZAD AGHAZADEH, ROBERT AZELBY, CHARLES BAUM, SCOTT CANUTE, BARBARA DUNCAN, PETER BARTON HUTT, IMMUNOMEDICS, INC., KHALID ISLAM ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11434168) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JAMES PETERSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HALPER, ZACHARY) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
