GOMEZ et al v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, d/b/a RUSHMORE et al
| ARAMIS GOMEZ and HEATHER GOMEZ |
| RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, d/b/a RUSHMORE and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT |
| 2:2020cv14402 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by HEATHER GOMEZ, ARAMIS GOMEZ. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, d/b/a RUSHMORE waiver sent on 10/16/2020, answer due 12/15/2020; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT waiver sent on 10/16/2020, answer due 12/15/2020. (MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, d/b/a RUSHMORE, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, filed by HEATHER GOMEZ, ARAMIS GOMEZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Certification)(MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
