MIRETSKAYA v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY et al
| YULIYA MIRETSKAYA |
| JOE DOES 1-N, ARUNESH P MISHRA, M.D., RARITAN BAY MEDICAL CENTER (RBMC), DR. CARTER, M.D., JEAN DOE 1, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE (UBHC), RAJKUMAR SINGH, M.D., MARIAM BEKHIT, M.D., JEAN DOE 2, HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP, JOHN DOE, M.D., RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, JANE DOE R.N. and JEAN DOE 3 |
| 2:2020cv14856 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE (UBHC), RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY identifying No parent company as Corporate Parent.. (SPONZILLI, EDWARD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE (UBHC) from Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesec County - Law Division, case number MID-L-5778-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11545703), filed by RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE (UBHC). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SPONZILLI, EDWARD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
